The problem of the Clash of Civilizations

The Clash of Civilizations (COC) is a theory that individuals’ social and religious characters will be the essential wellspring of contention in the post-Cold War world. Huntington contended that future wars would be battled not between nations, but rather amongst societies and that Islamic fanaticism would turn into the greatest danger to world peace. It was proposed in a 1992 address at the American Enterprise Institute, which was then created in a 1993 Foreign Affairs article titled “The Clash of Civilizations?” in light of his previous understudy Francis Fukuyama’s 1992 book, The End of History and the Last Man. Huntington later extended his proposition in a 1996 book The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order.


The expression itself was before utilized by Albert Camus in 1946, and by Bernard Lewis in an article in the September 1990 issue of The Atlantic Monthly titled “The Roots of Muslim Rage” Even prior, the expression shows up in a 1926 book in regards to the Middle East by Basil Mathews: Young Islam on Trek: A Study in the Clash of Civilizations.

This articulation gets from “conflict of societies”, effectively utilized amid the pioneer time frame and the Belle Époque


Why Civilizations Clash

Huntington offers six clarifications for why human advancements will conflict:

  1. Differences among human advancements are excessively fundamental in that civic establishments are separated from each other by history, dialect, culture, custom, and, most imperative, religion. These crucial contrasts are the result of hundreds of years and the establishments of various human advancements, which means they won’t be gone soon.
  1. The world is turning into a little Thus, associations over the world are expanding, which increase “development cognizance” and the attention to contrasts amongst civic establishments and shared characteristics inside human advancements.
  1. Due to financial modernization and social change, individuals are isolated from longstanding nearby characters. Rather, religion has supplanted this crevice, which gives a premise to character and duty that rises above national limits and joins civic establishments.
  1. The development of human advancement awareness is upgraded by the double part of the West. From one viewpoint, the West is at a pinnacle of energy. In the meantime, an arrival to-the-roots wonder is happening among non-Western civic establishments. A West at the pinnacle of its energy stands up to non-Western nations that undeniably have the craving, the will, and the assets to shape the world in non-Western ways.
  1. Cultural attributes and contrasts are less alterable and thus less effectively bargained and settled than political and monetary ones.
  1. Economic regionalism is expanding. Fruitful financial regionalism will fortify progress cognizance. Monetary regionalism may succeed just when it is established in a typical human progress.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *